A
weekly
message
from
your
Senator
Dear
Constituents
and
Friends,
We
are
five
weeks
away
from
adjourning
from
the
2017
Legislative
Session.
Conference
committee
members
have
been
appointed
and
we
are
now
waiting
for
them
to
meet
and
find
compromise
in
the
differences
between
the
House
and
the
Senate
on
bills
and
the
budget
for
the
state.
State
commissioners
are
involved
in
the
budget
negotiations
with
the
conference
committees
this
week.
I fully
support
Governor
Dayton’s
request
that
the
House
and
Senate
set
joint
conference
committee
targets
no
later
than
Friday,
April
28.
That
gives
conferees
two
weeks
after
the
Legislature
returned
from
the
Easter/Passover
break
and
leaves
more
than
three
weeks
to
negotiate
the
details
of
the
omnibus
budgets
before
the
May
22
adjournment
date.
With
a
$1.5
billion
remaining
budget
surplus
projected
for
the
next
biennium,
I
share
the
concern
over
many
proposed
cuts
and
shifts
used
to
balance
the
state budget.
I
also
support
the
request
that
is
there
are
agency
cuts
that
these be
clearly
defined,
rather
than
implementing
vague
across
the
board
percentage
cuts.
It’s
fair
to
ask
exactly
what
programs
should
be
cut
should
it
be
from
meals
for
seniors,
programs
to
help
our
most
vulnerable,
or
energy
assistance
programs
to
help
those
in
need?
Instead
of
cutting
spending,
the
proposed
budget
from
the
majority
pushes
spending
into
future
budgets.
This
puts
Minnesotans
on
the
hook
for
future
debts
when
we
can
pay
them
now
with
our
surplus
and
pay
them
on
time.
This
is
something
I
cannot
support.
Decisions
such
as
these
shifts
and
gimmicks
might
be
easy
for
the
short
term,
but
are
dangerous
for
the
long
term.
The
Minnesota
Management
and
Budget
office
agrees
these
decisions
will
seriously
jeopardize
the
state’s
long-term
fiscal
health. I will
continue
their
fight
for
fiscal
responsibility
and
will
not
consign
our
state
to
another
decade
of
deficits.
There
is
also
a
proposal
pushing
for
tax
breaks.
Although
I
support
modest
tax
breaks,
these
tax
spending
levels
are
not
sustainable
and
they
come
at
the
expense
of
working
Minnesotans
and
families
in
need. The
budget
proposed
by
the
majority
also
does
not
invest
in
things
Minnesotans
care
most
about. For
example,
the
education
budget
bill
does
not
invest
enough
money
in
schools.
Many
school
districts
are
worried
about
being
forced
to
cut
programming
and
teachers.
The
higher
education
bill
does
not
adequately
fund
the
University
of
Minnesota
or
state
colleges.
Students
and
faculty
are
worried
about
program
cuts
and
tuition
increases.
The
tax
bill’s
investment
in
Local
Government
Aid
(LGA),
while
it
increases
for
one
year,
actually
penalizes
many
communities
in
the
future,
cutting
up
to
$13,000
worth
of
aid
for
individual
cities
in
our
region
starting
in
2019.
The
transportation
bill
is
funded
largely
through
a
one-time
use
of
general
fund
dollars
that
are
supposed
to
pay
for
education,
health
services,
and
other
priorities.
Moreover,
it
does
not
invest
in
transit
at
all.
The
Minnesota
Chamber
of
Commerce
is
pushing
back
because transit
services,
whether
in
the
Twin
Cities
metro
area
or
in
Greater
Minnesota,
is
a
vital
link
in
our
state’s
transportation
system.
As
we
enter
into
the
final
weeks
of
the
2017
session,
we
are
hopeful
the
majority
will
get
their
budget
targets
set
on
time
which
is
April
28
and
make
some
concessions
with
the
Governor
for
a
better
budget
for
all
Minnesotans.
Sincerely,
Melisa
Preemption
bill
The
preemption
bill
passed
the
Senate
floor
this
week,
despite
the
many
concerns
expressed
by
members.
The
legislation
will
strip
away
the
power
of
local
governments
to
pass
labor
benefit
policies
such
as
earned
sick
time
and
higher
minimum
wages.
This
bill
would
also
retroactively
prohibit
the
enactment
of
compensation
benefits
the
cities
of
Minneapolis
and
Saint
Paul
have
recently
implemented.
Local
governments
often
take
action
in
response
to
a
challenge
identified
by
community
members.
This
bill
will
push
decisions
that
should
be
made
closest
to
the
people
up
to
the
state
level.
This
bill
restricts
the
authority
of
local
governments
to
implement
what
is
best
for
their
communities.
This
one-size-fits-all
approach,
is
backed
by
business
groups
in
reaction
to
ordinances
that
were
established
in
Minneapolis
and
Saint
Paul
that
required
qualifying
workers
to
have
access
to
paid
leave
benefits.
Proponents
of
this
proposal
worry
that
individual
cities
across
the
state
will
establish
their
own
benefit
policies,
which
will
result
in
differences
across
the
state.
Labor,
social
justice,
and
local
government
organizations
are
in
opposition
to
the
proposal,
arguing
that
local
elected
officials
are
capable
of
determining
what
is
best
for
their
residents.
Beyond
the
local
government
argument,
some
of
the
opponents
argue
that
there
is
moral
obligation
to
families
who
do
not
have
access
to
leave
benefits.
For
many
families
in
these
cities
and
across
the
state,
it
is
a
choice
between
putting
food
on
the
table
or
taking
their
child
or
parent
to
the
hospital. (HF600/SF580)
Some
Minnesotans
may
be
in
line
for
another
tax
refund
this
year
Tuesday
marked
the
last
day
to
file
or
apply
for
an
extension
on
state
and
federal
income
taxes.
The
date
was
three
days
later
than
the
typical
April
15
deadline
due
to
Monday’s
holiday
in
Washington,
D.C.
Taxpayers
are
able
to
check
on
the
status
of
their
state
income
tax
refund
by
contacting
the
Minnesota
Department
of
Revenue
at
“Where’s
My
Refund?”
or
1-800-657-3676.
For
those
that
were
unable
to
pay
all
taxes
owed
by
the
April
18
deadline,
the
Department
of
Revenue
may
be
able
to
work
out
a
payment
plan.
Visit
the website or
call
1-800-657-3909
during
business
hours.
The
timing
of
this
year’s
filing
deadline
comes
just
as
the
legislature
prepares
to
negotiate
a
tax
budget
with
Governor
Dayton.
The
budget
commits
about
$1.35
billion
of
the
state’s
$1.6
billion
budget
surplus
to
tax
cuts,
while
the
Governor
invests
about
$285
million
in
direct
tax
relief.
A
less
obvious,
but
very
important
difference
is
that
the
majority's
budget
spend
significantly
more
in
future
years.
For
instance,
the
cost
of
an
estate
tax
cut
for
about
1,000
heirs
inheriting
more
than
$2
million
balloons
to
more
than
$116
million
by
2020.
Governor
Dayton prefers
targeted
tax
relief
that
will
not
strangle
the
state’s
budget
in
future
years.
Finding
balance
among
the
three
proposals
while
saving
enough
to
invest
in
education,
health
care,
and
other
state
obligations
will
be
the
key
to
ending
session
by
the
May
22
deadline.
If
passed,
this
tax
bill
would
be
the
second
tax-relief
package
approved
in
2017.
The
legislature
worked
quickly
to
approve
a
tax
conformity
bill
in
January
that
updated
Minnesota’s
tax
code
to
federal
changes
adopted
since
Jan.
1,
2015.
As
a
result,
some
taxpayers
may
have
an
additional
state
tax
refund
coming
later
this
year.
Once
all
2016
taxes
are
processed,
the
Department
of
Revenue
will
begin
revising
2015
tax
documents
and
identifying
any
taxpayers
that
may
be
owed
additional
refunds
based
on
these
updates.
No
taxpayer
will
owe
additional
money,
but
some
may
see
checks
in
the
mail
before
the
end
of
the
year.
Taxpayers
should
not
file
amended
returns
unless
they
are
contacted
by
the
Department;
in
most
cases,
taxpayers
do
not
have
to
take
any
action
and
refunds
will
be
automatically
issued.
Minnesotans
most
likely
to
be
impacted
by
these
changes
include
teachers
with
classroom
expenses,
those
with
higher
education
tuition
payments,
homeowners
paying
mortgage
insurance
or
who
experienced
foreclosure
or
short-sale,
and
small
business
owners.
Teacher
licensure
bill
advances
in
Senate,
concerns
about
teacher
quality
raised
A
bill
to
revamp
the
state’s
Board
of
Teaching
and
create
a
tiered
educator
licensing
system
was
debated
and
passed
by
the
state
Senate
on
April
20.
The
Senate
language
was
included
in
the
E-12
education
finance
bill
that
passed
in
late
March
and
will
replace
the
House
licensure
language
on
House
File
140.
The
bill
also
seriously
changes
the
alternative
teacher
preparation
provider
requirements,
making
it
easier
for
an
alternative
program,
such
as
Teach
for
America,
to
be
established
in
Minnesota.
These
changes
could
threaten
teacher
preparation
quality.
Concerns
include
elimination
of
student
teaching
requirement
for
alternative
preparation
candidates,
mandatory
teacher
prep
program
approval
with
minimum
educator
standards,
and
removal
of
higher
education
partnership
requirement.
Four
tiered
licensure
areas
are
designed
with
licensure
qualifications,
duration,
and
renewal
set
up.
The
bill
provides
parameters
for
design
and
implementation
of
the
Professional
Educator
Licensing
and
Standards
Board
(PELSB)
and
removes
the
MDE
licensing
function
and
places
it
all
with
a
new
board
a
change
which
has
bipartisan
support.
The
Board
of
School
Administrators
will
remain
a
separate
entity
to
license
school
administrators.
The
PELSB
will
shrink
from
11
to
nine
members
and
include
two
administrative
members.
Teachers
will
make
up
the
majority
of
the
board
membership.
The
higher
education
member
is
eliminated,
even
though
the
board
is
tasked
with
approving
teacher
prep
programs.
No
current
Board
of
Teaching
member
can
be
a
member
of
the
new
board.
No
teacher
member
may
hold
a
position
with
the
union.
Several
concerns
are
cited
with
the
tiered
system
in
this
bill.
The
bill
allows
for
unlimited
renewals
for
Tier
1
licenses,
with
no
incentives
to
move
on
to
higher
levels
of
licensure.
The
licensure
board
is
also
required
to
grant
a
Tier
1
license
at
the
request
of
the
school
or
charter
board.
Furthermore,
years
served
in
Tier
1
cannot
be
counted
towards
continuing
contract
rights.
This
sets
up
a
process
for
individuals
with
no
teacher
training
or
pedagogy
to
teach
for
as
long
as
they
want
in
a
Minnesota
school.
The
bill
also
requires
licensure
candidates
to
participate
in
school
district’s
mentorship
or
teacher
evaluation
programs,
which
is
a
positive
requirement.
However,
many
districts
don’t
have
mentorship
programs
and
they
would
need
money
to
implement
one.
Changing
the
alternative
teacher
preparation
program
requirements
threaten
program
and
teacher
quality.
The
legislature
remains
committed
to
providing
quality
teachers
for
Minnesota’s
future
generations. (SF4)
Students
need
better
investment
to
afford
college
Three
competing
proposals
under
discussion
at
the
legislature
would
dramatically
affect
college
affordability
for
students
across
Minnesota.
Governor
Dayton
proposed
investing
$62
million
additional
dollars
into
the
state
grant
program
that
helps
Minnesota
students
pay
for
college
without
incurring
more
debt.
The
additional
investment
would
help
make
college
more
affordable
for
more
than
85,600
students,
with
an
additional
8,829
students
qualifying
for
financial
aid.
On
the
other
hand,
the
Senate’s
higher
education
budget
includes
only
$10.8
million
for
the
state
grant
program,
meaning
only
1,192
additional
students
would
be
served.
The
House
higher
education
budget
invests
$15
million,
providing
grant
funds
to
3,262
more
Minnesota
students.
The
average
Minnesota
student
leaves
four
years
of
college
or
career
training
with
$27,000
in
student
loan
debtthis
is
the
fifth
highest
in
the
nation.
The
price
of
tuition
doubled
between
2000
and
2012;
between
2013
and
2015,
Governor
Dayton
and
the
legislature
reversed
the
cuts
of
the
previous
decade,
increasing
higher
investments
by
20%.
Omnibus
Legacy
Bill
sent
to
the
floor,
includes
controversial
funding
for
buffers
The
Senate
Finance
Committee
heard
and
approved
the
Omnibus
Legacy
Bill
Thursday
and
forwarded
it
to
the
Senate
floor. The
bill
appropriates
biennial
funding
of
$529
million
from
the
four
legacy
funds
established
by
the
“Legacy
Amendment”
that
was
approved
by
Minnesota’s
voters
in
2008,
as
follows:
- Outdoor
Heritage
Fund
--
$104.6
million
(FY
2019
funds
will
be
appropriated
next
year)
- Clean
Water
Fund
--
$211.6
million
- Parks
and
Trails
Fund
--
$89.8
million
- Arts
and
Cultural
Heritage
Fund
--
$123.4
million.
The
bill
maintains
the
recommendations
of
the
Lessard-Sams
Outdoor
Heritage
Council
for
appropriations
from
the
outdoor
heritage
fund,
retains
a
40:40:20
distribution
for
parks
and
trails
(40%
to
the
DNR
for
state
parks
and
trails,
40%
to
the
Metropolitan
Council
for
metro
area
parks
and
trails,
and
20%
to
greater
Minnesota
parks
and
trails),
and
establishes
an
ongoing
5%
fund
balance
in
each
of
the
four
funds.
The
bill
faces
strong
opposition
from
a
number
of
environmental
groups
and
clean
water
advocates
who
are
concerned
about
the
clean
water
fund
portion
of
the
bill
that
shifts
$22
million
in
grants
to
the
state’s
90
soil
and
water
conservation
districts
to
help
with
buffer
compliance. In
2015,
legislators
funded
this
work
with
clean
water
fund
money,
but
said
future
funding,
beginning
in
2017,
would
come
from
the
state’s
general
fund.
This
bill
continues
to
fund
buffer
compliance
work
from
the
clean
water
fund,
which
critics
say
violates
the
spirit
of
the
Legacy
Amendment
and
means
deep
cuts
to
several
clean
water
programs
that
would
otherwise
be
funded,
including
drinking
water
and
groundwater
protections.
An
amendment
to
reverse
that
position
and
instead
fully
fund
the
recommendations
of
the
state’s
Clean
Water
Council
failed
on
a
voice
vote. The
bill
will
be
heard
next
on
the
Senate
floor.
(H.F.
707) |